Skip to content
Jaw Guide

Jaw Guide /All Guides

Two Dental Degree Names, One Professional Qualification

Stages 9
Read 16 min
Published
Clinical review
Illustration for this guide. Not a photograph of a specific patient or procedure.
  1. The short answer: DDS and DMD are equivalent U.S. dental degrees

    In the United States, DDS and DMD are different names for professionally equivalent dental degrees. Neither degree is inherently better, more advanced, more medical, or more surgical. The university determines which title it awards; students do not ordinarily choose between two different qualification levels within the same dental program.

    The DMD or DDS difference is therefore mainly a difference in naming:

    Comparison point DDS DMD
    Full name Doctor of Dental Surgery Doctor of Dental Medicine or Doctor of Medicine in Dentistry
    Degree type Foundational professional dental degree Foundational professional dental degree
    Curriculum requirements Same U.S. professional curriculum requirements Same U.S. professional curriculum requirements
    Qualification for general dentistry Educational foundation for general dentistry, subject to licensure Educational foundation for general dentistry, subject to licensure
    Licensing recognition Applicable to U.S. dental licensing pathways Applicable to U.S. dental licensing pathways
    Eligibility for postgraduate specialty training Graduates may pursue additional specialty education Graduates may pursue additional specialty education

    The American Dental Association states that DDS and DMD dentists receive the same education, that both degrees use the same curriculum requirements, and that the university decides which degree to award. See the ADA’s explanation of DDS and DMD degrees.

    Calling the degrees equivalent does not mean that every dentist is interchangeable. Dentists can differ in postgraduate education, procedure-specific experience, clinical focus, communication, professional conduct, referral judgment, and the services they provide. Two dentists with the same degree may have very different careers, while dentists with different degree titles may have closely comparable backgrounds.

    The useful distinction is between degree title and individual qualifications. DDS and DMD identify the foundational dental degree. The initials alone do not tell you whether a dentist completed a specialty residency, how often the dentist performs a particular procedure, or whether that dentist is suitable for your needs.

    This conclusion is specifically about the United States. Other countries may use different degree names and organize dental education, recognition, specialization, and licensing differently.

  2. What DDS and DMD stand for

    DDS stands for Doctor of Dental Surgery.

    DMD is commonly rendered in English as either Doctor of Dental Medicine or Doctor of Medicine in Dentistry. Both expansions refer to the same DMD degree; the wording does not create a difference in professional qualification.

    The potentially confusing words are “Surgery” and “Medicine.” Read literally, they can make the degrees sound like separate branches of dentistry. They are not.

    The word “Surgery” in DDS does not mean that every DDS is an oral and maxillofacial surgeon. DDS is the name of a foundational professional dental degree. Oral and maxillofacial surgery requires postgraduate education beyond that base degree.

    Likewise, the word “Medicine” in DMD does not show that a DMD graduate received more medical education than a DDS graduate. The title does not confer an additional medical qualification or a higher professional rank.

    Interpreting the abbreviations word by word is therefore misleading. A DDS is not automatically “the surgical dentist,” and a DMD is not automatically “the medically trained dentist.” Either graduate may later obtain additional education, develop a particular clinical focus, or pursue specialty training.

    Plain-language takeaway: the initials identify the degree name selected by the university, not the dentist’s clinical ranking.

  3. Education, accreditation, and licensure: where the degrees align

    DDS and DMD programs have the same professional purpose: providing the foundational dental education graduates need before moving through the applicable licensing process.

    A peer-reviewed historical review reported no differences between DDS and DMD degrees in admissions standards, accreditation, or state licensure requirements during the period it examined. Its conclusion was that the two titles have different historical origins but represent equivalent U.S. dental degrees. Read the peer-reviewed review abstract indexed by PubMed.

    The general educational pathway begins with predental undergraduate education. Applicants must meet the prerequisites of the schools to which they apply, but not every applicant necessarily follows one identical undergraduate route.

    Dental school then combines classroom instruction, laboratory work, and supervised clinical education. ADA patient guidance describes dental school as generally lasting four years, usually after three or more years of undergraduate education. That is a broad description rather than a guarantee that every student’s complete timeline or admissions path will be identical.

    As students progress, they develop knowledge relevant to oral health and gain supervised experience evaluating and treating patients. Degree equivalence does not mean that every dental school experience is identical.

    What equivalence does mean is that DDS and DMD are not separate professional levels. The abbreviation does not establish that one program was more medical, more surgical, more demanding, or more clinically advanced than the other.

    Graduation and licensure are also distinct. A degree is an educational credential; practicing requires satisfaction of the licensing requirements that apply in the relevant jurisdiction. ADA patient guidance describes written and clinical licensing requirements and continuing-education obligations in general terms, but exact requirements can vary and may change. Dentists and patients should consult the relevant licensing authority for current jurisdiction-specific information rather than assuming that one process applies everywhere.

    A simplified pathway looks like this:

    1. Predental education: The future dentist completes the prerequisites required by the schools to which they apply.
    2. Dental school: The student completes a DDS- or DMD-awarding program involving academic, laboratory, and supervised clinical education.
    3. Licensure: The graduate satisfies the requirements imposed by the jurisdiction in which they intend to practice.
    4. Ongoing professional obligations: The dentist maintains the credentials required for continued practice, which may include continuing education.
    5. Optional postgraduate education: Some graduates complete residencies or specialty training after earning the general dental degree.

    The first two stages explain why DDS and DMD are equivalent foundational qualifications. The later stages explain why dentists who began with equivalent degrees may eventually develop substantially different professional profiles.

    Continuing education should also be interpreted carefully. The fact that a dentist completed continuing education does not, by itself, establish specialty status or expertise in every related treatment.

  4. Why two equivalent degree names exist

    The two titles exist largely for historical reasons. They do not represent a modern division between “dental surgery” and “dental medicine.”

    The DDS title is associated with the Baltimore College of Dental Surgery, which began awarding the Doctor of Dental Surgery degree in 1840. When Harvard opened its dental school in 1867, it adopted a Latin-derived DMD designation in keeping with its degree-naming traditions. Universities later retained different naming conventions even as the degrees came to represent the same professional qualification. The history is summarized in the peer-reviewed review of the two degree titles cited above.

    Continued use of both abbreviations does not show that the profession has two educational tiers.

    The 2022 historical review advocated standardizing the degree name as DMD, partly to reduce public confusion and reflect the authors’ view of dentistry’s relationship to broader healthcare. That was a recommendation about future naming—not evidence that current DDS and DMD holders possess different qualifications.

    It is also unhelpful to rank the degrees according to how many schools award each one. School totals can change, and figures from different sources may refer to different dates. Even an accurate count would describe the popularity of a naming convention, not the level of the degree.

    The apparent contradiction is therefore straightforward to resolve: DDS and DMD have different historical names but equivalent modern professional meaning in the United States.

  5. Common myths about what the initials allow a dentist to do

    The wording of the degrees encourages several understandable misconceptions. The simplest correction is to separate the base degree from the dentist’s later training, licensure, experience, and individual practice.

    Myth: A DDS is automatically a dental surgeon or has more surgical expertise.

    Fact: DDS is the name of a foundational dental degree. The word “Surgery” does not establish that the dentist completed an oral and maxillofacial surgery residency, regularly performs a particular operation, or has more surgical experience than a DMD.

    A DDS might have extensive surgical experience, limited surgical experience, or formal postgraduate specialty education. The same possibilities apply to a DMD. The degree abbreviation does not identify which description fits a particular dentist.

    Myth: A DMD receives additional medical training.

    Fact: The DMD title does not establish extra medical education compared with a DDS. The ADA describes holders of the two degrees as receiving the same dental education under the same curriculum requirements.

    An individual dentist may pursue further education related to medically complex patients, pathology, sedation, hospital-based care, or another area. That preparation must be evaluated separately; it cannot be inferred from “DMD.”

    Myth: One set of initials permits a broader general-dentistry scope.

    Fact: DDS versus DMD does not create a different foundational professional level. What a dentist may appropriately provide depends on the applicable jurisdictional requirements, licensure, training, competence, and any procedure- or specialty-specific rules.

    Degree equivalence should not be stretched into the claim that every dentist can or should perform every dental procedure. Even where a type of treatment may be available in general practice, it may fall outside an individual dentist’s training, usual services, facilities, or professional judgment. Referral can be appropriate because of complexity, medical considerations, anatomy, or the clinician’s assessment of the case.

    Myth: DDS and DMD dentists provide different categories of general dental care.

    Fact: The initials do not divide dentists into separate surgery and medicine tracks. A practice’s services depend on its clinicians, training, equipment, patient population, judgment, and referral arrangements—not simply on the wording printed on a diploma.

    For that reason, an exhaustive list of procedures supposedly available from every DDS or every DMD would be misleading. Ask the practice who would perform the proposed treatment and what relevant preparation that clinician has.

    Myth: Equivalent degrees mean any two dentists are interchangeable.

    Fact: Equivalence applies to the foundational degree, not every feature of professional practice. Individual dentists may differ in:

    • Postgraduate residencies and specialty education
    • Procedure-specific training and experience
    • Frequency of performing a treatment
    • Clinical focus and services offered
    • Experience with complex or medically involved cases
    • Communication and informed-consent practices
    • Treatment philosophy
    • Referral thresholds
    • Continuing education
    • Professional history
    • Office accessibility and care coordination

    The initials answer one narrow question: which professional dental degree title did the university award? They do not answer all the questions that determine whether a dentist is a suitable choice for particular care.

  6. The base degree is not the same as a dental specialty

    Dental credentials are easier to understand when viewed as layers.

    The first layer is the foundational professional degree: DDS or DMD. It identifies completion of the university’s professional dental program.

    The second layer is the professional license. A degree is an educational credential, while a license is the jurisdiction’s authorization to practice under its applicable requirements. Patients should not treat the diploma and the license as interchangeable.

    The third layer may include postgraduate residency or specialty education. Graduates with either a DDS or DMD may pursue further training. Orthodontics, periodontics, and oral and maxillofacial surgery are examples of fields requiring postgraduate education beyond the general dental degree. ADA patient guidance distinguishes the base dental degree from additional specialty training.

    This distinction leads to four practical rules:

    • DDS alone does not mean oral and maxillofacial surgeon.
    • DMD alone does not mean medical specialist.
    • Either degree may be followed by specialty training.
    • Specialist preparation must be established separately from the base degree.

    A fourth credential layer may include board credentials, fellowships, memberships, certificates, academic degrees, hospital appointments, honors, or continuing education. These designations do not all represent the same kind or amount of achievement.

    One credential might reflect completion of a postgraduate program. More letters after a name do not automatically mean more expertise relevant to the treatment you are considering.

    When you encounter an unfamiliar credential, ask:

    1. What does the credential stand for?
    2. Which organization or institution issued it?
    3. Was it earned through a residency, examination, course, membership, or another route?
    4. How much supervised education or clinical training did it involve?
    5. What professional status does it represent?
    6. How is it relevant to the proposed treatment?
    7. Does it require ongoing maintenance?

    These questions are useful when a biography uses phrases such as “advanced training,” “fellow,” “board qualified,” or “specialist” without explaining what the designation required. The aim is not to dismiss unfamiliar credentials but to determine precisely what they demonstrate.

    For example, when considering orthodontic treatment, the useful question is not whether the clinician has a DDS or DMD. It is what postgraduate preparation and relevant credentials the clinician has for the care being offered. When considering oral surgery, ask who will perform the procedure, what relevant education that person completed, and how the practice decides when referral is appropriate.

  7. How to compare two dentists when one has a DDS and the other a DMD

    Once the abbreviation is set aside, you can compare dentists using information more relevant to the proposed care.

    Confirm current licensure

    Ask whether the dentist holds the license required in the jurisdiction where care will be provided. For current verification instructions, consult the appropriate licensing authority rather than relying solely on a practice biography, advertisement, or third-party directory.

    Licensing systems and the information they provide are not necessarily identical. This article does not offer a universal state-by-state verification process, so questions about status or terminology should be directed to the relevant authority.

    Ask about training relevant to the procedure

    General experience can be informative, but procedure-specific preparation is often more useful. Consider asking:

    • What training did you complete for this procedure?
    • Was the training part of dental school, a residency, a formal postgraduate program, or continuing education?
    • How regularly do you perform this particular treatment?
    • What features would make my case more complex?
    • Which complications do you manage directly?
    • When would you involve or refer to another clinician?
    • Who will perform each stage of treatment?
    • Where will follow-up care take place?

    These questions are not accusations. A dentist does not need to perform every possible procedure to be a good clinician, and a thoughtful referral policy can provide useful information about professional judgment.

    Clarify specialty and board claims

    If a practice describes a dentist as a specialist or mentions a board credential, ask for the exact title and issuing organization. Then ask what education, assessment, or other requirements were involved and how the credential relates to your treatment.

    Avoid reducing the inquiry to the number of letters after the dentist’s name. One credential directly related to the proposed care may be more informative than several unrelated designations.

    Evaluate the treatment conversation

    Credentials matter, but so does the quality of the explanation you receive. Before consenting, consider whether the dentist clearly addresses:

    • The diagnosis and the basis for it
    • The goal of the recommended treatment
    • Reasonable alternatives
    • What may happen if treatment is delayed
    • The expected stages and timeline
    • Who will perform each stage
    • Important risks, limitations, and uncertainties
    • Recovery and follow-up
    • Circumstances that could require referral
    • Fees and what the quote includes
    • Factors that could create additional charges

    Jaw Guide’s article on questions worth asking before agreeing to dental surgery offers a compact framework for discussing alternatives, timing, costs, and who will perform a procedure.

    A dentist should explain the recommendation in language you can understand. If the explanation remains unclear, ask for clarification, written information, or time to consider the plan.

    Consider practical fit

    A clinically suitable dentist may still be a poor practical fit. Compare:

    • Whether the required service is offered
    • How the office handles referrals
    • Appointment availability
    • Physical and communication accessibility
    • Emergency and after-hours arrangements
    • Whether treatment occurs at more than one location
    • How records and imaging are coordinated
    • Whether fees and payment expectations are explained
    • Whether you can obtain clear answers before consenting

    Convenience should not replace relevant qualifications, but it is a legitimate consideration when treatment requires multiple appointments or coordination among providers.

    Treat experience as information, not a guarantee

    Training, credentials, and experience can support a better-informed decision, but none guarantees a particular outcome. The goal is not to find a title that eliminates uncertainty. It is to determine whether the clinician appears appropriately prepared for the proposed care, communicates clearly, recognizes limitations, and has a sensible approach to referral and complication management.

    Jaw Guide describes itself as independent background reading intended to help patients understand dental terminology and prepare better questions. Educational material should support—not replace—an individual assessment by an appropriately qualified professional.

  8. U.S. equivalence does not answer every international credential question

    The central conclusion here concerns U.S. dental education and professional recognition: DDS and DMD are equivalent foundational dental degrees.

    Other countries may use credentials such as BDS or additional dental degree titles. Their systems may differ in program structure, terminology, regulation, licensing, and routes to specialization. A title that is recognized in one country does not, by itself, establish what the holder may do in another.

    There is no single international rule that resolves every case. The appropriate pathway may depend on the jurisdiction, the original education, the type of practice sought, and the requirements in effect at the relevant time. Broad claims that every internationally trained dentist must follow one identical U.S. or Canadian route should therefore be avoided.

    Patients and internationally trained professionals should consult the dental licensing authority for the particular state, province, territory, or country involved. Three questions should be kept separate:

    1. Degree recognition: How does the jurisdiction evaluate the original educational credential?
    2. Permission to practice: What requirements apply before the person may practice there?
    3. Specialist status: What additional education or recognition is required for a specialty designation?

    Academic recognition of a degree, authorization to practice, and recognition as a specialist are related questions, but they are not interchangeable.

    For U.S. patients, the practical rule remains simple: when comparing two appropriately licensed U.S. dentists, DDS versus DMD is not a meaningful ranking system.

  9. Frequently asked questions

    Is a DMD better than a DDS?

    No. In the United States, DMD and DDS are professionally equivalent foundational dental degrees. Neither title identifies a higher qualification level, a broader general dental education, or inherently greater clinical ability. The university determines which degree name it awards.

    Individual dentists may still differ in postgraduate education, experience, professional conduct, communication, and clinical focus. Those differences belong to the dentists, not to the DDS or DMD abbreviations.

    Do DDS and DMD dentists receive the same education?

    The ADA states that DDS and DMD dentists receive the same dental education and that both degree types use the same curriculum requirements.

    Schools may nevertheless differ in faculty, electives, facilities, patient populations, clinical opportunities, and teaching methods. Equivalence of the degrees does not mean that every school experience or graduate is identical.

    Does DDS mean the dentist is an oral surgeon?

    No. Doctor of Dental Surgery is the full name of the foundational DDS degree. It does not, by itself, show that the dentist completed postgraduate oral and maxillofacial surgery training.

    To evaluate a claim of specialist preparation, look beyond “DDS” or “DMD” and ask about the relevant postgraduate education and credentials.

    Can both DDS and DMD graduates become dental specialists?

    Yes. Graduates with either degree may pursue postgraduate specialty education. The specialty preparation comes after the foundational DDS or DMD degree; it is not created by choosing one of those two titles.

    If specialty care is proposed, ask what postgraduate program the clinician completed, what credential is being claimed, who issued it, and how it relates to the proposed treatment.

    Should I choose a dentist based on DDS or DMD?

    No. If you are comparing Dr. Lee, DDS, with Dr. Patel, DMD, the initials should not decide the choice. Both are equivalent foundational U.S. dental degrees.

    Instead, ask whether the dentist is appropriately licensed, has training and experience relevant to the proposed care, explains the diagnosis, alternatives, risks, and fees clearly, and knows when specialist referral is appropriate. Communication, accessibility, available services, and referral practices may also matter.

    These considerations can inform a decision, but they cannot guarantee an outcome. This article provides general educational background, not individualized dental advice or an assessment of any clinician.

Written by

Maren Osei

Editorial, Jaw Guide. Writes about dental procedures for patients; not a clinician.

Clinical review

Not reviewed

No dentist or oral surgeon has signed off on this guide. If one does, their name, credentials and review date will appear in this slot. We do not list reviewers who have not read the piece.

How we write this: from published patient information and treatment documentation, not from examining anyone. We publish no risk percentages or recovery statistics we cannot point to a source for, and where a figure is genuinely unknown the page shows a dash instead.